HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fuentealba IC Articles by Hecker KG Related Collections Communication Curriculum Structure Educational Approaches for Learning Educational Scholarship Outcomes Assessment Professional Development Assessment Skills, Knowledge and Professional Attributes Clinical Competence

Clinical Preceptor Evaluation of Veterinary Students in a Distributed Model of Clinical Education

The study reported here investigates the reliability and validity of a standardized evaluation form used to assess students’ knowledge, clinical skills, interpersonal skills, and professionalism during fourth-year clinical rotations in a distributed model of veterinary education. A form designed to assess veterinary knowledge (5 items), clinical skills (7 items), interpersonal skills (3 items), and professionalism (6 items) was used by clinical preceptors to evaluate student performance across different rotations. For the period January–May 2007, 218 evaluations were completed for 81 students; each student was assessed in at least two rotations. Mean scores across the 21 items ranged from 3.42 (SD = 0.61) to 3.87 (SD = 0.37). Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis. The 21 items loaded on three underlying factors, professionalism, knowledge and clinical skills, accounted for 70.35% of the variance. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of each subscale was high, ranging from 0.88 for clinical skills to 0.94 for professionalism and 0.96 for the entire tool. Correlations between subscales were significant (p < 0.01), ranging from r = 0.62 to r = 0.76. Preliminary analysis suggests that the evaluation tool has good internal reliability. Construct validity analysis suggests that certain items relating to interpersonal skills and clinical skills were assessing either knowledge or professionalism. Clinical preceptors could differentiate between different skill levels for knowledge and clinical skills. Challenges associated with the assessment of professionalism are discussed.

Key Words: evaluation • clinical rotations • professionalism • validity • reliability

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hecker and C. Violato Validity, Reliability, and Defensibility of Assessments in Veterinary Education J Vet Med Educ, September 1, 2009; 36(3): 271 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Kochevar and E. Stone Accessing clinical competency-our professional responsibility. Proceedings of the AAVMC Educational Symposium. June 2008. J Vet Med Educ, September 1, 2008; 35(3): 340 - 438. [Full Text] [PDF]

AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.